Adobe Wins Patent Trial Against Macromedia
(May 9, 2002) 
Adobe and Macromedia met in court this week. Read what both companies tell about it. We'll leave it up to you to interpret it your own way.
Read it at the external site...
Adobe's press release:
SAN JOSE, Calif. — May 2, 2002 (NASDAQ: ADBE) — Adobe Systems Incorporated, the leader in network publishing, today announced that it has received a favorable jury verdict in its intellectual property case against Macromedia, Inc. in the U.S. District Court of Delaware, finding willful infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,546,528. The patent at issue covers Adobe's reconfigurable tabbed palette patent, which is Adobe's method of displaying and working with multiple sets of information in the same area of the computer screen. The patented invention allows users to customize how the functions in the product are organized on their workspace.
"We are very pleased with the verdict," said Bryan Lamkin, senior vice president of Adobe's graphics business unit. "We've maintained all along that Macromedia infringes this patent. While we would have preferred to settle this issue out of court, we are satisfied that the validity of this key innovation has been upheld."
Adobe was awarded $2,822,280 in damages and the company anticipates that the court will issue an injunction to stop Macromedia's infringement.
About Adobe Systems Incorporated
Founded in 1982, Adobe Systems, Incorporated (www.adobe.com), the leader in network publishing, offers a comprehensive line of software for enterprise and creative professional customers. Its products enable customers to create, manage and deliver visually rich, compelling and reliable content. Based in San Jose, Calif., Adobe is one of the world's largest software companies with annual revenues exceeding $1.2 billion.
Note to editors: More information surrounding the case can be found by visiting: www.adobe.com/adobefacts/main.html
Macromedia's press release:
SAN FRANCISCO—May 2, 2002—Macromedia, Inc. (Nasdaq:MACR) today announced that a jury ruled in favor of Adobe Systems, Inc. in its patent infringement suit against Macromedia. The verdict included a damage award of $2.8 million. Macromedia expects no material impact from this judgment on the Company's financial condition or market leadership.
"It is unfortunate, and we believe wrong, that Adobe has chosen this field to compete. Ultimately, it is our customers, and particularly our mutual customers, that will be harmed," said Rob Burgess, chairman and CEO, Macromedia. "Nonetheless, we have no choice but to protect our right to innovate and must defend ourselves on this playing ground."
In August 2000, Adobe filed suit against Macromedia in the U.S. District Court of Delaware. Macromedia filed counterclaims of patent infringement in response to Adobe's lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of Delaware in September 2000. Macromedia will be presenting its case as it relates to its patents beginning on Monday, May 6, 2002. In October 2001, Macromedia brought a patent infringement suit against Adobe in the Northern District of California relating to additional patents that Macromedia believes that Adobe infringes.
Except for the historical information contained herein, matters discussed in this news release may be considered forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including those related to customer acceptance of new products and services and new versions of existing products, the impact of competition, the risk of delay in product development and release dates, the potential for unpredictable outcomes related to litigation, risks of product returns, and the other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's SEC reports, including without limitation its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2001 as they may be updated or amended with future filings. The actual results the Company achieves may differ materially from any forward looking statements due to such risks and uncertainties. The Company assumes no obligation to update the forward looking information contained in this press release, except as otherwise required by law.
ABOUT MACROMEDIA
Macromedia www.macromedia.com empowers millions of designers and developers to create effective user experiences across the widest array of platforms and devices. Through an open, integrated family of client, tool, and server technologies, Macromedia is driving a new generation of rich Internet applications that will radically improve the Internet experience.
User Reviews
Total of 6 reviewsTough one
Written by Andrew Petrillo on October 30, 2003My first love was Adobe, but c'mon now, whining about tabs??when I hear 'adobe' I think of the acrobat reader and photoshop. When I hear 'macromedia' I think of the baddest pieces of software to ever hit the industry. if it wasn't for them, we'd be ...
Adobe are sour cus they calnt compete with macromedia
Written by Jason Chandler on May 17, 2002I hope macromedia runs adobe off the face of the planet. Adobe stuff is over priced and no where near as user friendly. Ps7.0 wow a few extra features and a bigger price tag. Freehand vs Illustrator (we know where its good). Dreamweaver pisses all ...
Will this affect the release of Dreamweaver MX . . .
Written by Victor Corey on May 13, 2002and if so, is there anything we, as users of Macromedia products (and probably Adobe products), do. I personally do not use Adobe products unless absolutely necessary. Would it do any good for Macromedia devotees to boycott using, purchasing or ...
RE: This is BS
Written by Andrew Watson on May 10, 2002BS Maybe but imagine if the bloke who DID invent the hammer had patented it!
No New Thing
Written by Les Matthews on May 10, 2002Patents are issued for many notions that are way too common to be considered original. But if Amazon can patent the number of clicks it takes a user to add an item to a shopping cart, I guess anything can be patented. Just because someone if the ...
This is BS
Written by Ivan I. on May 9, 2002This is like saying that because my hammer looks and works the same as yours, i'm going to sue you.
